What's so illogical about Christianity?
Feb. 13th, 2006 07:18 amIn the 2000 years since Jesus Christ was born, many heresies have sprung up regarding the “one true faith.” It didn’t take long for people to misuse and misunderstand the message of the Messiah. Isn’t that why there are so many denominations these days?
The most common answer is to use 1 Corinthians 12:4-6 to answer that question. “There are different kinds of gifts, but the same spirit. There are different kinds of service but the same Lord. There are different kinds of working, but the same God works all of them in all men.”
These days, though, it seems that there is a vast sea of denominations. Add in the non-denominational churches and you’ve got a veritable chaos of Christianity. At least it makes me confused.
To paraphrase George Orwell, “All Christians are equal, but some Christians are more equal than others.” What I’m trying to say here is that though Christians start off saying all denominations are equal, but they will invariably tell you why their denomination (or lack of denomination) is best. How can one denomination be better than the others if they are all “equal”?
I guess the most illogical thing about Christianity is this: If I were to ask ten Christians of different denominations what the basic tenets of Christianity are, I would get ten different answers (especially if you include the “universal” Catholic faith).
Why should I believe anyone over anybody else?
The most common answer is to use 1 Corinthians 12:4-6 to answer that question. “There are different kinds of gifts, but the same spirit. There are different kinds of service but the same Lord. There are different kinds of working, but the same God works all of them in all men.”
These days, though, it seems that there is a vast sea of denominations. Add in the non-denominational churches and you’ve got a veritable chaos of Christianity. At least it makes me confused.
To paraphrase George Orwell, “All Christians are equal, but some Christians are more equal than others.” What I’m trying to say here is that though Christians start off saying all denominations are equal, but they will invariably tell you why their denomination (or lack of denomination) is best. How can one denomination be better than the others if they are all “equal”?
I guess the most illogical thing about Christianity is this: If I were to ask ten Christians of different denominations what the basic tenets of Christianity are, I would get ten different answers (especially if you include the “universal” Catholic faith).
Why should I believe anyone over anybody else?
no subject
Date: 2006-02-13 01:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-13 01:52 pm (UTC)Maybe because Christianity isn't about adhering to a specific set of tenets. Maybe it's not about what you think, but about who you follow. I know if someone asked me to define a relationship with a fellow mortal in a few easy "tenets," I would have different answers from hour to hour (if I bothered to come up with an answer at all). Why should a relationship with the Lord of all creation be easy to define or describe?
My Take
Date: 2006-02-13 01:55 pm (UTC)As an individual who has woked in eight different denominations before finding his home in the Church of the United Brethren in Christ, I have come to a conclusion about denominations by understanding the difference between dogma and doctrine.
Every denomination that holds to some form of orthodox Christianity holds to the basic fundamantals of the Christian faith that I find wrapped up the Apostles' Creed:
Denominations, except those who have become heretical and deny any of these rather basic tenets, differ in doctrine which is a matter of emphasis or preference.
Evangelical Lutherans and Baptists adhere to the same dogma, they differ over the doctrine of baptism, but I would never call either group heretical. Presbyterians emphasize a certain form of church government. Pentecostals and charismatics are into the Holy Spirit. Methodists (before the majority went liberal) had a unique methodical method of Bible study.
Now admittedly there are those who elevate doctrine to the point of dogma, but that's their ballywick.
By the bye, I'm not saying doctrine isn't important. Dogma covers salvation issues (what C.S. Lewis would call "mere Christianity"), but doctrine puts the flesh over the bare bones and determines how we live out our committment to Christ.
Re: My Take
Date: 2006-02-13 03:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-13 02:12 pm (UTC)I don't think that one is better than another. I think that ANYONE, Christian or not, who condemns those who are different or believe differently....well, they are the ones in the wrong.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-13 09:21 pm (UTC)I agree. I understand that some religions place an emphasis on converting others to their faith. What I don't understand is when people of generally the same faith (say Baptist vs Catholic) condemn each other. I know the saying is that the devil is in the details, but if the main tenets of both faiths are the same, shouldn't that suffice?
no subject
Date: 2006-02-13 02:31 pm (UTC)All people are equal, right? Yet, you wouldn't consider dating every person in the world - just the ones that make you feel warm inside. Denominations inside Christianity are much the same way. They're all paths to God, but each have a slightly different terrain for you to experience. I'm not big into mountain biking, but maybe you are so the mountain biking path might be best for you. Etc.
One reason they are all "equal" is due to war. When they weren't considered equal, people tended to get violent over them and a lot of misery was spread around. We're supposed to love our neighbor, not murder them and everyone else in the village for not being [insert denomination here].
Man is a Religious Animal. He is the only Religious Animal. He is the only animal that has the True Religion--several of them. He is the only animal that loves his neighbor as himself and cuts his throat if his theology isn't straight. He has made a graveyard of the globe in trying his honest best to smooth his brother's path to happiness and heaven...
- Mark Twain</b<
no subject
Date: 2006-02-13 02:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-13 02:37 pm (UTC)I would hope they would all agree on one: that the only way to salvation is through Jesus Christ.
Whether or not drinking or dancing is a sin, or if a woman's place is in the home, or if birth control is wrong, etc. is superfluous.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-13 05:00 pm (UTC)Don't ask me, I never found an answer to that question.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-13 08:30 pm (UTC)Neither knitting nor crocheting is inherently better. I fully respect my friends who crochet and prefer not to knit. I know how to do both, an I do see the inherent advantages of crochet. However, I prefer the way the knit stitch looks, I like being able to make pretty cables, and I think it's easier to get a nice even tension with knitting. So for me, knitting is better, and if someone asks me for my advice on which to learn, I will probably recommend knitting because I prefer it. They asked me for my opinion, after all.
Cats aren't inherently better than dogs. However, I prefer cats in pretty much every way -- I think they're more beautiful, I think they're better for snuggling (dogs tend to be tense and bony, even the ones small enough to fit in your lap), I like that they don't -always- need my attention and when I want to withdraw, they're cool with it, I even prefer the way that they smell. I know that there are advantages to owning a dog -- they're more fawning, if you like that sort of thing, and more easily trained, and you can teach them tricks and take them places. But for me, cats are better. I prefer cats.
Equal doesn't mean exactly the same. Two things that are equal overall can have aspects of them that are different, and those aspects can decide what choice an individual makes. When people say that all denominations of Christianity are equal (although I've never actually heard anyone say that before now) but that theirs is better because of X reason, what they're saying is that their denomination is better FOR THEM.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-13 09:19 pm (UTC)I have never heard anyone say that before either. Each denomination of Christianity has its own unique qualities. The one thing that should make them equal is what exactly it would take to get into heaven.
Baptists don't drink or dance. Roman Catholics serve wine at Mass. Roman Catholics are opposed to birth control (at least that is the official line), but non-denominational Christian faiths may be fine with it. I think the increase in popularity of non-denom Christian faiths is because people had difficulty reconciling their beliefs in God and Christ with some of the finer details of other faiths.
I don't think any of these faiths would consider themselves equal to others (if they were, and did, then why the distinctions?). I could be wrong though.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-25 07:45 pm (UTC)